<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Turbulent Black Tea &#187; Jack Skeen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/author/jackskeen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com</link>
	<description>The Boisterous Tea Of Liberty Is Never Without A Wave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Myth Adventures Of Myth Understandings</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/04/03/the-myth-adventures-of-myth-understandings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/04/03/the-myth-adventures-of-myth-understandings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Skeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mostly Harmless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debunking Canadian health care myths By Rhonda Hackett As a Canadian living in the United States for the past 17 years, I am frequently asked by Americans and Canadians alike to declare one health care system as the better one. Often I&#8217;ll avoid answering, regardless of the questioner&#8217;s nationality. To choose one or the other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Debunking Canadian health care myths</h3>
<p>By Rhonda Hackett</p>
<p>As a Canadian living in the United States for the past 17 years, I am frequently asked by Americans and Canadians alike to declare one health care system as the better one.</p>
<p>Often I&#8217;ll avoid answering, regardless of the questioner&#8217;s nationality. To choose one or the other system usually translates into a heated discussion of each one&#8217;s merits, pitfalls, and an intense recitation of commonly cited statistical comparisons of the two systems.</p>
<p>Because if the only way we compared the two systems was with statistics, there is a clear victor. It is becoming increasingly more difficult to dispute the fact that Canada spends less money on health care to get better outcomes.</p>
<div id="TixyyLink"><strong>Myth: Taxes in Canada are extremely high, mostly because of national health care.</strong></p>
<p>In actuality, taxes are nearly equal on both sides of the border. Overall, Canada&#8217;s taxes are slightly higher than those in the U.S. However, Canadians are afforded many benefits for their tax dollars, even beyond health care (e.g., tax credits, family allowance, cheaper higher education), so the end result is a wash. At the end of the day, the average after-tax income of Canadian workers is equal to about 82 percent of their gross pay. In the U.S., that average is 81.9 percent.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: Canada&#8217;s health care system is a cumbersome bureaucracy.</strong></p>
<p>The U.S. has the most bureaucratic health care system in the world. More than 31 percent of every dollar spent on health care in the U.S. goes to paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc. The provincial single-payer system in Canada operates with just a 1 percent overhead. Think about it. It is not necessary to spend a huge amount of money to decide who gets care and who doesn&#8217;t when everybody is covered.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: The Canadian system is significantly more expensive than that of the U.S.</strong>Ten percent of Canada&#8217;s GDP is spent on health care for 100 percent of the population. The U.S. spends 17 percent of its GDP but 15 percent of its population has no coverage whatsoever and millions of others have inadequate coverage.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: Canada&#8217;s government decides who gets health care and when they get it.</strong>While HMOs and other private medical insurers in the U.S. do indeed make such decisions, the only people in Canada to do so are physicians. In Canada, the government has absolutely no say in who gets care or how they get it. Medical decisions are left entirely up to doctors, as they should be.</p>
<p>There are no requirements for pre-authorization whatsoever. If your family doctor says you need an MRI, you get one. In the U.S., if an insurance administrator says you are not getting an MRI, you don&#8217;t get one no matter what your doctor thinks — unless, of course, you have the money to cover the cost.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: Canada is a socialized health care system in which the government runs hospitals and where doctors work for the government.</strong>Princeton University health economist Uwe Reinhardt says single-payer systems are not &#8220;socialized medicine&#8221; but &#8220;social insurance&#8221; systems because doctors work in the private sector while their pay comes from a public source. Most physicians in Canada are self-employed. They are not employees of the government nor are they accountable to the government. Doctors are accountable to their patients only.</p>
<p>It is not a perfect system, but it has its merits.</p>
<p>-<br />
<a href="http://www.denverpost.com" target="_blank">The Denver Post </a></p>
</div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.turbulentblacktea.com%2F2010%2F04%2F03%2Fthe-myth-adventures-of-myth-understandings%2F&amp;title=The%20Myth%20Adventures%20Of%20Myth%20Understandings" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/04/03/the-myth-adventures-of-myth-understandings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Sense From A Southern Boy From Tennessee. Bob Corker Speaks Out On Financial Reform.</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/26/good-sense-from-a-southern-boy-from-tennessee-bob-corker-speaks-out-on-financial-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/26/good-sense-from-a-southern-boy-from-tennessee-bob-corker-speaks-out-on-financial-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Skeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mostly Harmless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Corker, the Republican Senator from Tennessee, talks more sense than has come from the mouths of most in Washington for months. &#8220;Voters want to see the end of &#8216;too-big-to-fail&#8217; financial firms but don&#8217;t care about the other, more arcane details that divide the two parties.&#8221; Has Congress allowed themselves to become so polarized over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/common_sense.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-434" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="common_sense" src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/common_sense.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Bob Corker, the Republican Senator from Tennessee, talks more sense than has come from the mouths of most in Washington for months.</p>
<p>&#8220;Voters want to see the end of &#8216;too-big-to-fail&#8217; financial firms but don&#8217;t care about the other, more arcane details that divide the two parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>Has Congress allowed themselves to become so polarized over the heat of the health care debate that they&#8217;ve dismissed good sense when faced with it? Is everyone unwilling to work together even when it is for the common good of all?</p>
<p>&#8220;This is so unlike the health care debate,&#8221; said Corker, noting that some of his Republican colleagues have made misjudgments on that point over the last month. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think people realize that this is an issue that almost every American wants to see passed. &#8220;I think that again a major strategic error has occurred.&#8221;</p>
<p>-<br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34932.html" target="_blank"> Bob Corker: GOP erred on financial reform</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.turbulentblacktea.com%2F2010%2F03%2F26%2Fgood-sense-from-a-southern-boy-from-tennessee-bob-corker-speaks-out-on-financial-reform%2F&amp;title=Good%20Sense%20From%20A%20Southern%20Boy%20From%20Tennessee.%20Bob%20Corker%20Speaks%20Out%20On%20Financial%20Reform." id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/26/good-sense-from-a-southern-boy-from-tennessee-bob-corker-speaks-out-on-financial-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Bans Small Breasts</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/20/australia-bans-small-breasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/20/australia-bans-small-breasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Skeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mostly Harmless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia&#8217;s government is banning adult publications and films featuring women with small breasts, says Aussie activist Fiona Patten. A ban that classifies normal female bodies as &#8216;obscene&#8217; could not be any more insulting, says adult industry blog, Ms Naughty. Not only does this encourage women to have breast augmentations, it characterizes men who think small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/20457_article_main.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-267" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" title="20457_article_main" src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/20457_article_main.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Australia&#8217;s government is banning adult publications and films featuring women with small breasts, says Aussie activist Fiona Patten.</p>
<p>A ban that classifies normal female bodies as &#8216;obscene&#8217; could not be any more insulting, says adult industry blog, Ms Naughty. Not only does this encourage women to have breast augmentations, it characterizes men who think small boobs are sexy as perverts.</p>
<p>-<br />
<a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/105766/Australias_small_breast_ban" target="_blank"> Australia&#8217;s &#8216;small breast&#8217; ban</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.turbulentblacktea.com%2F2010%2F03%2F20%2Faustralia-bans-small-breasts%2F&amp;title=Australia%20Bans%20Small%20Breasts" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/20/australia-bans-small-breasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove And Tom Brokaw Aren&#8217;t Playing Nice Together. Who Gets Time Out??</title>
		<link>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/17/karl-rove-and-tom-brokaw-arent-playing-nice-together-who-gets-time-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/17/karl-rove-and-tom-brokaw-arent-playing-nice-together-who-gets-time-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Skeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mostly Harmless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when we thought kindergarten was decades behind us&#8230; Rove once again proves that he doesn&#8217;t play well with others, manipulates the class with his own version of &#8216;facts&#8217;, and admits that a factor in going into Iraq was to stop Saddam from holding all of his own oil on his own side of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rove_baby.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-217" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 8px; margin-right: 8px;" src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rove_baby.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Just when we thought kindergarten was decades behind us&#8230; Rove once again proves that he doesn&#8217;t play well with others, manipulates the class with his own version of &#8216;facts&#8217;, and <em>admits</em> that a factor in going into Iraq was to stop Saddam from holding all of his own oil on his own side of the playground. Rove takes this <em>sharing </em>thing quite seriously, you know. Saddam wasn&#8217;t shaaaaarrrrrriiiiiiinnnng!!</p>
<p><strong>Rove:</strong> I–let me correct you. There–you put down a lot of things here. The administration emphatically said that this was not about oil. And we thought right from the beginning…<br />
<strong>Brokaw:</strong> No, no, no, not about oil, but it was about…<br />
<strong>Rove:</strong> Let me finish.<br />
<strong>Brokaw:</strong> …how it would–we would share oil revenue&#8230;<br />
<strong>Rove:</strong> No. No, no. Tom, with all due respect&#8230;<br />
<strong>Brokaw: </strong> But it would be part of the consequence of getting the country stabilized.<br />
<strong>Rove:</strong> No. Well, part of the consequence would be that, that Saddam Hussein, who used the oil market to manipulate prices and deny supplies to the West, would no longer be in a position to do that.</p>
<p>-<br />
<a href="http://factcheck.org/2010/03/rove-vs-brokaw-and-other-sunday-squabbles/" target="_blank"> Rove Vs. Brokaw</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.turbulentblacktea.com%2F2010%2F03%2F17%2Fkarl-rove-and-tom-brokaw-arent-playing-nice-together-who-gets-time-out%2F&amp;title=Karl%20Rove%20And%20Tom%20Brokaw%20Aren%26%238217%3Bt%20Playing%20Nice%20Together.%20Who%20Gets%20Time%20Out%3F%3F" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turbulentblacktea.com/2010/03/17/karl-rove-and-tom-brokaw-arent-playing-nice-together-who-gets-time-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

